Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Ç°ñ¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¹é¾ÇÁú ¹× °ñÈ­¼º¼¶À¯Á¾ÀÇ ÀÓ»ó ¹× ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû °íÂû

THE CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGIC CONSIDERATION OF CEMENTIFYING AND OSSIFYING FIBROMA OF THE JAWS

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1997³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.161 ~ 172
Á¶Àº°æ, ³²½Â¿ì, ±èÁÖÈÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶Àº°æ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
³²½Â¿ì (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
±èÁÖÈÖ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

ÀúÀÚµéÀº 1980³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1995³â 12¿ù±îÁö ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿øÀ» ³»¿øÇÏ¿© ÀÓ»óÀû,
¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ±×¸®°í Á¶Á÷º´¸®ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¹é¾ÇÁú ¹× °ñÈ­¼º¼¶À¯Á¾À¸·Î Áø´Ü¹ÞÀº 13¿¹¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸
·Î ÀÓ»óÀû, ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ±×¸®°í Á¶Á÷º´¸®ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú
´Ù.
1. ¹ß»ý¿¬·ÉÀº 29¼¼ ¿¡¼­ 65¼¼±îÁö·Î ´Ù¾çÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç Æò±Õ¿¬·ÉÀº 44¼¼ÀÌ°í, ¿¬·Éº°·Î
´Â 30´ë¿¡¼­ 6¿¹·Î °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¼ºº°ºÐÆ÷´Â ¿©¼º¿¡¼­ 11¿¹, ³²¼º¿¡¼­ 2¿¹
5:1ÀÇ ºñÀ²·Î ¿©¼º¿¡¼­ È£¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2.³»¿ø´ç½ÃÀÇ È¯ÀÚÀÇ Áּҷδ ¾È¸éºÎÀÇ Á¾Ã¢¸¸À» ÁÖ¼Ò·Î ³»¿øÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ 6¿¹·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò
°í ¹«Áõ»óÀ¸·Î ¿ì¿¬È÷ ¹ß°ßÇÑ °æ¿ìµµ 3¿¹¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
3. ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßÀ¸·Î´Â ÇϾǿ¡¼­ 12¿¹·Î »ó¾ÇÀÇ 1¿¹¿¡ ºñÇØ ¿ì¼¼ÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç ¹ß»ý
ºÎÀ§º°·Î´Â ¼Ò¡¤´ë±¸Ä¡ºÎ¿¡¼­ 11¿¹·Î °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´°í, º´¼ÒÀÇ °æ°è´Â ºÐ¸íÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡
8¿¹, ´ú ºÐ¸íÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ 5¿¹¿´À¸¸ç °æ°è°¡ ºÒºÐ¸íÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¼º¼÷Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÐ·ù¿¡
¼­´Â ¹æ»ç¼±Åõ°ú¼º º´¼Ò°¡ 1¿¹, ÈçÇÕ¼º º´¼Ò°¡ 9¿¹, ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼º º´¼Ò°¡ 3¿¹¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³µ
´Ù.
4. Á¶Á÷º´¸®ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßÀ¸·Î´Â °ñÈ­¼º¼¶À¯Á¾ÀÌ 7¿¹, ¹é¾ÇÁú°ñÈ­¼º¼¶À¯Á¾ÀÌ 4¿¹, ±×¸®°í ¹é
¾ÇÁú È­¼º¼¶À¯Á¾Àº 2¿¹·Î °ñÈ­¼º¼¶À¯Á¾À¸·Î Áø´ÜµÇ¾îÁø Áõ·Ê°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to know the proper diagnosis and to establish the
treatment plan of cementifying and ossifying fibroma in the jaws through the clinical,
raiological, and histopathologic considerations. The authors compared and analyzed the
clinicoradiologic features of the thirteen cases of cementifying and ossifying fibroma,
diagnosed at the Dental college hospital in Yonsei university, Seoul, Korea, during the
period from 1980 to 1995.
The obtained results were as follows
1. Cementifying and ossifying fiblroma occured in the mean age, 44 years, ranged
from 29 to 65 years and the male to female ratio was approximately 1:5.
2. Swelling was the most common frequent presenting complaints. Other reported
symptoms included pain, tooth mobility and asymptom.
3. The frequency of the lesions was twelve cases in the mandible and one case in the
maxilla. And eleven of thirteen cases were distributed on the premolar and molar region.
4. Radiologically, eight of thirteen cases were well defined lesions, five cases were
relatively well defined lesions. And nine of thirteen cases were mixed lesions, three
cases were radiopaque lesions, and only one case was purely radiolucency lesion.
5. Histologically, semen of thirteen cases were classified ossifying fibroma, four cases
were cemento-ossifying fibroma, and two cases were cementifying fibroma.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸